|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
TI:
|
The Mentoring Relationship as a Complex Adaptive System: Finding a Model for Our Experience
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Rachel Jones; Dot Brown
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Mentoring & Tutoring
|
|
|
|
|
Mentoring & Tutoring
2012
VOL. 19
NO. 4
pp. 401-418
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2012
VO: 19
NO: 4
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
401-418
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
Routledge
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
Mentoring theory and practice has evolved significantly during the past 40 years. Early mentoring models were characterized by the top-down flow of information and benefits to the prot?g?. This framework was reconceptualized as a reciprocal model when scholars realized mentoring was a mutually beneficial process. Recently, in response to rapidly changing organizational and social environments, scholars have explored other models of mentoring such as developmental networks. However, as we, the authors, reflect on our own experience of an informal mentoring process in an academic context we find existing models inadequately describe our experience. The model that best fits our story is a complex adaptive systems (CAS) perspective of the mentoring relationship, and we offer this lens to reconfigure current models.
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
mentoring,complex adaptive systems, self-reflection,
theory, mentoring models
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
TI:
|
Critical Thinking, Caring and Professional Agency: An Emerging Framework for Productive Mentoring
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Geraldine Mooney Simmie; Joanne Moles
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Mentoring & Tutoring
|
|
|
|
|
Mentoring & Tutoring
2011
VOL. 19
NO. 4
pp. 465-482
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2011
VO: 19
NO: 4
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
465-482
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
Routledge
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
In this paper, we report on a mentoring programme which provides an accreditation pathway to a master’s level qualification. The paper served three purposes. First, informed by selected literature on education we caution against expedient reductionist models that are based solely on novice–expert mentoring relationships with limited facility for critical inquiry. Second, we present an evolving theoretical framework for productive mentoring based on our critique of a preferred academic literature and interactions with mentor teachers, school principals and teacher educators. We proactively encouraged an awareness of societal norms and traditions that can appear as counterculture to critical thinking. Lastly, we consider some implications for productive mentoring as an academic, caring and professional practice within a continuum of teacher education.
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
expedient reductionist models,
critical thinking,
caring and professional agency,
productive mentoring, four principles, contextually responsive
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.
|
TI:
|
Raising the quality of vocational teachers: continuing professional
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Caroline Lloyd; Jonathan Payne
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Research Papers in Education
|
|
|
|
|
Research Papers in Education
2012
VOL. 27
NO. 1
pp. 1-18
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2012
VO: 27
NO: 1
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
1-18
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
Routledge
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
The view that vocational education and training is central to economic prosperity and social well?being is one that is widely held by policy?makers in many countries. Delivering this agenda requires skilled and professional teachers. Ensuring that vocational teachers are able to maintain and develop both their ‘craft’ skills and pedagogy, through continuing professional development (CPD), is, therefore, a growing area of policy concern. While research has revealed that models for the regulation and organisation of CPD for vocational teachers vary across countries, their relative effectiveness has rarely been considered. This paper seeks to address this gap by comparing the approaches currently being adopted in three countries – England, Wales and Norway. Focusing specifically on teachers of hairdressing, it explores the opportunities for CPD and considers the constraints on teachers’ ability to reflect and improve on their practice. The research draws mainly on interviews with teachers of hairdressing in two English and two Welsh further education colleges and three Norwegian upper?secondary schools. The findings suggest that while hairdressing lecturers in England and Wales have more opportunities to keep up to date with their ‘craft’, those in Norway find it easier to access pedagogic education and inhabit an institutional environment that affords more time and space to share ideas and collectively improve their practice.
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
vocational teachers, CPD,England,
Wales, Norway
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.
|
TI:
|
Who succeeds in mathematics? Caribbean perspectives on the mix of schools and mathematics
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Patricia George
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Research Papers in Education
|
|
|
|
|
Research Papers in Education
2012
VOL. 27
NO. 1
pp. 103-121
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2012
VO: 27
NO: 1
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
103-121
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
Routledge
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
Within the Caribbean, there has been a perception that students are underachieving in mathematics. This assessment has seemingly been based amongst other things upon the proportion of students who are successful in mathematics compared to other subjects in external examinations. This notion was investigated in a case study of secondary schools in Antigua and Barbuda. Statistical data showed that student achievement in the examinations was on average lower in mathematics than across all subjects, including English language. However, this finding was not ‘true’ of students across all school?types, generally a proxy for social class in Caribbean settings. In particular, the mathematics achievement of students in single?sex schools was not far different from their performances in other subjects, but was markedly different from that of students in mixed?sex schools. This finding concerning school?type suggested at an underlying factor in many students’ mathematics performance, as school?type in the Caribbean is predicated on students’ home backgrounds. This paper reports on these findings, and sets out how the education system appears to reinforce and further exaggerate advantages and disadvantages of students’ social and cultural histories
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
Caribbean, mathematics,
school?type, cultural capital,
achievement
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.
|
TI:
|
Disciplinarity in question: comparing knowledge and knower codes in sociology
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Kathy Luckett
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Research Papers in Education
|
|
|
|
|
Research Papers in Education
2012
VOL. 27
NO. 1
pp. 19-40
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2012
VO: 27
NO: 1
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
19-40
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
Routledge
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
This paper contributes to understanding why curriculum design in a discipline with a horizontal knowledge structure is difficult, time?consuming and contested. A previous paper on the same case study in one sociology department reported that students who had completed the general sociology major found it lacking in coherence. To illustrate the problem, I selected two third?year sociology courses, Urban Studies and Diversity Studies, and set out to compare and contrast how knowledge claims are made and legitimated in these two discourses. The paper also has a methodological focus – to demonstrate the potential of systemic functional linguistics as a method of discourse analysis that can complement and deepen a sociological analysis – Bernstein’s sociology of education and in particular his concept of ‘grammaticality’. I seek to make explicit the basis for knowledge claims in these two sub?disciplines and then to investigate how this ‘grammar’ is built into criteria for assessing students. The long?term goal of this project is pedagogic – to understand how academic discourses work, in order to contribute to the development of more coherent curricula and visible pedagogies with explicit assessment criteria, for the enhancement of teaching and learning. The analysis shows that the ‘grammars’ of these two academic discourses (in the same discipline, sociology) are based on different ordering principles; they are based on different ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions. The analysis also shows that the respective ‘grammars’ do ‘get into’ the assessment criteria, although in a contextually contingent manner. The paper concludes by suggesting that the use of SFL as a method of discourse analysis within a social realist sociology of education framework proved to be fruitful and worthy of further development, particularly for education development work where the quest to make explicit the criteria for producing a ‘legitimate text’ is critical.
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
higher education, curriculum studies, education development,
sociology of education,
sociology, systemic functional linguistics, legitimation code theory
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.
|
TI:
|
Doing Good and Doing Well: Credentialism and Teach for America
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Adam Maier
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Journal of Teacher Education
|
|
|
|
|
Journal of Teacher Education
2012
VOL. 63
NO. 1
pp. 10-22
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2012
VO: 63
NO: 1
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
10-22
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
SAGE
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
In recent years, Teach for America (TFA) has placed thousands of high-achieving college graduates in hard-to-staff schools, and its popularity continues to grow. TFA thus represents an anomaly: it attracts higher education’s top students to primary and secondary education’s least desired jobs. This article reviews the current explanations for TFA’s success and draws from credentialism theory to explain how these theories overlook a key characteristic differentiating TFA from other programs, and how this difference limits TFA’s generalizability. Using credentialism theory, previous research, and official recruitment messages, this article delineates TFA’s use and exchange values and finds that TFA, by recruiting noneducation majors from prestigious universities, remaining selective, embedding members in a resource-rich social network, and increasing access and reducing the costs for its members to connect to nonteaching career ladders, has increased its credential’s exchange value relative to other preparation programs. The research and policy implications of TFA’s high exchange value are discussed.
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
alternative certification;
educational policy; recruitment and retention
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.
|
TI:
|
Learning communities for curriculum change: key factors in an educational change process in New Zealand
|
|
|
|
AU:
|
Frances Edwards
|
|
|
|
JN:
|
Professional Development in Education
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Development in Education
2012
VOL. 38
NO. 1
pp. 25-47
|
|
|
|
DA:
|
2012
VO: 38
NO: 1
|
|
|
|
PG:
|
25-47
|
|
|
|
PB:
|
Routledge
|
|
|
|
AB:
|
Increasingly school change processes are being facilitated through the formation and operation of groups of teachers working together for improved student outcomes. These groupings are variously referred to as networks, networked learning communities, communities of practice, professional learning communities, learning circles or clusters. The formation and support of these types of groups to build capacity has been a major feature in the professional support landscape for New Zealand schools for a number of years, with sustainability and longevity of these groups seen as success criteria. A professional learning community approach was adopted by the New Zealand Ministry of Education to help schools implement the revised New Zealand Curriculum by facilitating the development of community members’ capacities and expertise in school curriculum design. In this article I report on my experience as the facilitator of one professional learning community of nine schools that worked together over a two-year period. Three significant phases in the life of this community are identified and illustrated: establishing, converging, and diverging. I contend that sustainability and longevity are not necessarily key determinants of a community’s success, but that success can be attained through the community’s ability to flexibly achieve its purposes and prepare for future change.
|
|
|
|
KW:
|
professional development,
learning community,networks,
curriculum implementation,
educational change
|
|
|
|
LK:
|
|
|
|
|
NT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|